NewLive in three weeksHow we deploy

JobsHVAC · Construction

Submittal review

Product data compared against the governing spec section, with deviations and missing information drafted into review comments for the engineer to approve.

All jobs
Works with
Project engineers, project managers and engineers of record
Starts from
Submittal packages and the project specifications
Delivers
A draft review with every deviation cited

01

Summary

A single mechanical submittal can run to hundreds of pages of cut sheets, performance data and certifications, and every page has to be checked against the spec section that governs it. It is careful, slow work, and it piles up exactly when the schedule is tightest.

Operon reads the submittal and the spec side by side. It pulls the requirements out of the spec section (capacities, materials, ratings, accessories, certifications), finds the matching data in the product literature, and drafts a review: what complies, what deviates and what is missing. The engineer reads the draft, not the whole stack.

02

Inputs and outputs

What goes in

  • Submittal packages: cut sheets, performance data and shop drawings
  • The governing specification sections
  • Equipment schedules and the relevant plan sheets
  • Your review stamp and comment conventions

What comes out

  • A requirement-by-requirement compliance table
  • Deviations and missing data, each cited to its page
  • Draft review comments in your format
  • A record of who approved what, and when

03

How it runs

01

Extract the requirements

Operon

Turns the spec section into a checklist of requirements.

Your team

Adds project-specific requirements or exceptions.

02

Find the evidence

Operon

Locates each requirement's answer in the product data, page by page.

Your team

Flags manufacturer data that needs a closer look.

03

Draft the review

Operon

Marks each requirement as met, deviating or missing, with citations, and drafts the comments.

Your team

Reads the draft and edits the comments.

04

Sign and track

Operon

Logs the decision and keeps the reviewed submittal linked to the spec and the schedule.

Your team

Stamps and returns the submittal.

04

What changes

First pass

Today

Every page read against the spec

With Operon

A draft with every deviation cited

Consistency

Today

Depends on who reviews

With Operon

The same checklist on every submittal

Record

Today

Comments in a PDF markup

With Operon

Each decision linked to its requirement

05

Checks built in

The engineer signs

Operon drafts. Approval, rejection and the stamp stay with your engineer.

Cited, not summarised

Each finding points to the spec clause and the page of product data.

06

Getting started

Send two or three submittals your team has already reviewed, with their spec sections. Compare our draft with your final review.

First results within a week. Live in three weeks.

  • Two or three reviewed submittal packages
  • The governing spec sections
  • Your returned reviews, for comparison

Start with the work that costs you the most.

Tell us where your team loses the most hours. Three weeks later, an AI employee built for your company is doing that work.